Thank you for your question.
It is not a question of "which" is better. Both are sound goals and part of the process for one to succeed in our business, and the reason why, (if you would allow me,) I would change the word "or" to "and".
Go ahead and sponsor as many PSAs each year for as much as you can afford. However, in doing so, we have to bear in mind to only invest in what we can afford to lose. There are no guarantees that we will get a fair number of active sign-ups out of the hundreds of our sponsored affiliates. Likewise, we cannot disregard the fact that we, too, may be able to find the "gems" we seek in those numbers... and thereafter, to take it upon us, our responsibility and duty to be their "awesome" sponsor.
One of the most important of our concerns should be - to be able to handle everyone of them to the best of our ability, to be able to give them 100% of our quality time in teaching, guiding, mentoring and inspiring them. Only by being able to do so, and without discriminating either goals - sponsoring hundreds of PSAs AND being a great sponsor to the few, presently active affiliates, - will both goals only work to our advantage.
less
Thank you for your question.
It is not a question of "which" is better. Both are sound goals and part of the process for one to succeed in our business, and the reason why, (if you would allow me,) I would change the word "or" to "and".
Go ahead and sponsor as many PSAs each year for as much as you can afford. However, in doing so, we have to bear in mind to only invest in what we can afford to lose. There are no guarantees that we will get a
...
more
